Re: Second Stage of Op-Am (Current to Voltage)

From: Monty Hall (chickenkungpao_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 12/28/04


Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:54:18 GMT

Larry thanks for the response!!!! It's exactly what I was looking for! The
discussion in another subthread w/ Active8 threw me for a loop - as he
didn't believe a negative Iout could exist. Finally, I can ask my real
question...

If the cap is a current integrator that does the transduction to voltage,
wouldn't the output ramp wrt time until saturated in an open loop
configuration & (V+ - V-) < 0? Of course, integration would stop when (V+ -
V-) == 0 because Iout ==0. The (V+ - V-) < 0 can be substitued w/ > 0 ,
just want Iout to be consistently non zero & + or - wrt time.

It seems very contrary to some web pages & text that say that the op-amp can
be operated open loop and the output is as simple as Vout = A(V+ - V-). If
current integration is true - any (V+ - V-) < 0 would cause saturation -
eventually - due to Iout != 0 - right? If this is not the case and the
op-amp output voltage settles to a value in an open loop & (V+ - V-) < 0
configuration, why does the settling happen despite Iout != 0?

Larry, sorry if my terminology in my prev post is unclear - I'm a newbie to
EE :) All others, the schematic of op-amp stage 1 & 2 @ bottom of page.

Regards,

Monty

"Larry Brasfield" <donotspam_larry_brasfield@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:FYcAd.1$UN4.698@news.uswest.net...
> "Monty Hall" <chickenkungpao@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:_mbAd.3725$li1.1840@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
>> From the schematic below, can Iout be bidirectional?
>
> Yes. Iout is the difference between Ic2 (designated as leaving Q2-C)
> and Ic1 (designated as entering Q4-C). Since both are positive and
> about matched, their difference can take either sign.
>
>> Included is the schematic of Fredericken's(Intuitive IC Op Amps) basic
>> op-amp sans stage 3 - emitter follower unity gain output. How is Iout
>> converted to voltage?
>
> You can think of Cc and that (nameless) rightmost transistor
> as an integrator (if Early voltage is infinite) or as a high-gain
> stage with a very low frequency pole (otherwise).
>
>> In Frederickson's text:
>> "The second stage of the basic op-amp converts this current back into
>> a voltage Vout, that will become the output voltage of the op amp. An
>> internal capacitor, Cc, is the component that does this conversion of
>> current to voltage."
>
> That seems to eliminate the role of that nameless transistor.
> Since it functions to hold its base at nearly constant voltage,
> by driving the top end of Cc, that is quite an omission.
>
>> It would seem that this statement has answered my question. How is Vo
>> calculated and how can Iout be negative? Active8, I'm speaking wrt
>> Frederickson's text & schematic below. He clearly states Iout can be
>> bi-directional.
>>
>> First I want to make sure about the bi-directionality of Iout - it seems
>> there is disagreement here from other posts.
>
> Anybody who disagrees with the bi-directionality is mistaken.
>
>> How would you characterize stage 1's output @ Vo'. Is it:
>> 1.) a current pump w/ Iout(V+ - V-) = Ic2 - Ic1 & 2Ic < Iout < 2Ic
>
> Ok. We usually call that a current source.
>
>> 2) a high impedance voltage source Vo' = Av(V+ - V-)
>> 3) something else
>>
>> If it is 2, I would appreciate it if you can answer the following:
>>
>> 1. How do you compute Vo'?
>
> In the simplest model of that circuit, you need not compute it
> at all. Qnameless holds it constant by virtue of it low input
> impedance relative to the output impedance of Q2-Q4.
>
>> IOW, how is the transfer function of Vo'/(V+ - V-) & Vo/(V+ - V-)
>> derived? Basically not sure how calculate collector voltage that has an
>> active load. I've always assumed that the delta in collector currents
>> from Q2 and Q4 make a current pump @ that point.
>
> Then stop worrying about the voltage transfer function.
> Write the transconductance transfer function. With very
> little error (easily accommodated as a 2nd order effect),
> you can use simple device transconductance to derive it.
>
>> 2. Why is the discussion about Iout = Ic2 - Ic1 relevant if 2 is true?
>
> Not going there.
>
>> Ga Tech/Penn State/MTU/UNLV/... lectures always have DC analysis of the
>> differential amplifier active load end w/ Iout(V+ - V-) = Ic2 - Ic1 and
>> stop short of stage 2 conversion of current to voltage. However,
>> Frederickson's "Intuitive IC op-amps" mentions the cap is where the
>> conversion takes place. Other - specifically Active8 - may choose "3)
>> something else" because he believes that Iout can't be negative.
>
> If he truly believes or stated that, throw out his book. It will
> do more harm than good with respect to your understanding.
> Are you sure you are not mischaracterizing him?
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Monty
>>
>> +Vcc +Vcc
>> o o
>> | |
>> | |
>> 2 Ic = Bias Current Io = Bias Current
>> | |
>> | |
>> | |
>> o------o-----o |
>> | | |
>> |< >| o-------o----o Vo
>> Vin(-) -| Q1 Q2 |- Vin(+) | |
>> |\ /| Cc --- o
>> |Ic1 Ic2 | --- |
>> | | Vo' | |/
>> | o----------------------o---o-|
>> | | Iout = Ic2 - Ic1 (+/- 2 Ic)|>
>> | | o
>> | | |
>> | | Ic1 |
>> | o |
>> | |/ |
>> o----o---o-| Q4 |
>> | | |> |
>> | | Ic1 o |
>> | o | |
>> | |/ | |
>> |--| Q3 | |
>> |> | |
>> | | |
>> -------o |
>> | |
>> | |
>> -Vee -Vee
>> (created by AACircuit v1.28.4 beta 13/12/04 www.tech-chat.de)
>
> --
> --Larry Brasfield
> email: donotspam_larry_brasfield@hotmail.com
> Above views may belong only to me.
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: PID question
    ... An analog input on the micro will monitor load current. ... controlling the set voltage. ... Since you are dealing with a loop you should analyse it ... Ki is an integrator which means its response falls at 20dB/decade and it has ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: How a Telephone Works
    ... the telco has to apply DC bias voltage and AC ring ... This voltage causes a direct current to flow in the loop. ... channels, often on two copper pairs, at 1.544 Mbps. ...
    (comp.dcom.telecom)
  • Re: Faraday "magnetic" induction without a magnetic field.
    ... ignoring the meters there is only a single current loop. ... the circuit is. ... Thevenin's voltage is an easy way that usually ... You have an ideal voltage source in series with two resistors -3 elements with a single common current (Note that Lewin also assumed this when calculating the current by Ohms law. ...
    (sci.physics.electromag)
  • =?windows-1252?Q?Re=3A_Faraday_=93magnetic=94_induction_without_a_magne?= =?windows-1252?Q?t
    ... there you would read real voltage across the copper. ... part of a loop where the flux is changing. ... 1A into 10R with an internal winding resistance of 1mR. ... consisting of the winding and the voltmeter. ...
    (sci.physics.electromag)
  • Re: Faraday "magnetic" induction without a magnetic field.
    ... change of B in a closed loop and the induced EMF around that loop that ... I suspect you mean it increases the KE of charge and is related to the ... Measure the voltage across the cut. ... So what happens if we want to make resistance very very low (we won't ...
    (sci.physics.electromag)

Quantcast