Tesla "Death Ray" not really a ray?
gregory.hilson_at_gmail.com
Date: 01/28/05
- Next message: john jardine: "Re: anti-malware progs ineffective"
- Previous message: Nico Coesel: "Re: OT: anti-malware progs ineffective"
- Next in thread: Joe McElvenney: "Re: Tesla "Death Ray" not really a ray?"
- Reply: Joe McElvenney: "Re: Tesla "Death Ray" not really a ray?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 28 Jan 2005 07:58:52 -0800
Hello all,
I recently finished a biogrpahy of Nikola Tesla by Mary Cheney
(Tesla: Man Out of Time). It's chronological and has some references
to his inventions and hypotheses but in minute detail.
The description of the "Death Ray" got me thinking. There is a quote
about stopping 10,000 enemy planes from entering within hundreds of
miles of a city's borders.
Since his research was heavily into fields, maybe it wasn't a death
ray afterall but instead a force field? Whether it repelled or had so
much energy it disintegrated things on contact who knows, but such a
device could fall under the same description. It would be like a field
shell instead of a filled field sphere.
Thoughts on this line of thinking? In short: Taking an electric
field and allowing it to be repulsive or filled at it's outermost edges
with highly-charged particles and/or an atoms thickness?
- Next message: john jardine: "Re: anti-malware progs ineffective"
- Previous message: Nico Coesel: "Re: OT: anti-malware progs ineffective"
- Next in thread: Joe McElvenney: "Re: Tesla "Death Ray" not really a ray?"
- Reply: Joe McElvenney: "Re: Tesla "Death Ray" not really a ray?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]