Re: one bit of memory?
From: Robert Monsen (rcsurname_at_comcast.net)
Date: 02/05/05
- Next message: Robert Monsen: "Re: Definitive Guide To Electronics?"
- Previous message: John Comma Smith: "Re: Another odd circuit request"
- In reply to: Thomas A. Horsley: "one bit of memory?"
- Next in thread: Robert Monsen: "Re: one bit of memory?"
- Reply: Robert Monsen: "Re: one bit of memory?"
- Reply: Tom Horsley: "Re: one bit of memory?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 22:58:54 -0800
Thomas A. Horsley wrote:
> In my ongoing quest to waste as much time as possible on my silly
> phone gadget (http://home.att.net/~Tom.Horsley/phonetale/markII.html)
> I added a circuit to "remember" if the phone ever rang so I can
> turn on a flashing LED as a "missed call" reminder.
>
> For memory I used the LM339 as OR-gate sample circuit from the
> NS pdf spec ***, and fed back the output as one of the inputs
> with the output from the 555 timer being the other input.
>
> This worked great till I decided to switch to the much lower power
> LM339 near-compatible TLC3704 chip from Texas Instruments
> (http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/tlc3704.html).
>
> Apparently the push-pull outputs work differently enough that the
> initial power-up state of the chip is "on" rather than "off", so
> my one bit memory circuit doesn't work with the new chip very
> well (but I don't want to go back to the 339 because overall
> the new circuit uses a lot less power than the old one and I don't
> need pull-up resistors all over the place).
>
> Anyone have any suggestions for a nice low power way to provide
> the one bit of memory I need? Or maybe a way to hack around the
> initial power-up state so I ignore that particular bit of feedback,
> but notice it later when I really want it?
>
> (Of course if I really wanted to save power, I wouldn't add all this
> extra junk anyway - the important bits seem to be working fine
> and only draw about 0.5mA - about 10 times less than the first version).
According to your circuit schematic, your comparator has negative
feedback. That means it isn't acting as a comparators, it's acting as an
(uncompensated) opamp. This may well result in oscillations.
Here is a circuit that may work. It's a starting point for some
experimentation anyway. It's a flipflop, with the comparator used to
increase the impedance of the output. If your comparator is open
collector, you may need a pullup resistor on the output.
VCC=9V
.------------------o-------o-----------.
| | | |
| | | |
.-. .-. .-. |
| |100k 100k | | | |47k |
| | | | | | |
'-' '-' '-' |
| | | |\|
| o-------)---------|-\ Output
| ___ ___ | | | >------.
From 555 o-|___|-. .-|___|-o---. o-----o---|+/ |
___ | 1MEG | | 1MEG | | | | |/| |
->|--|___|--o----)-------o | |/ | | | ___ |
100k | \| '--)-----| | | '---|___|-----'
| |--------' |> | | | 1MEG
--- <| | | .-. |
1uF --- | | | | |47k |
| | | | | | | Rang=Low
| | | | '-' |
| | | | | |
'----o------------------o---)---o-------o---'
GND | |
| |
| |
| T |
| --- |
'----o o----'
Reset
(created by AACircuit v1.28 beta 10/06/04 www.tech-chat.de)
--
Regards,
Robert Monsen
"Your Highness, I have no need of this hypothesis."
- Pierre Laplace (1749-1827), to Napoleon,
on why his works on celestial mechanics make no mention of God.
- Next message: Robert Monsen: "Re: Definitive Guide To Electronics?"
- Previous message: John Comma Smith: "Re: Another odd circuit request"
- In reply to: Thomas A. Horsley: "one bit of memory?"
- Next in thread: Robert Monsen: "Re: one bit of memory?"
- Reply: Robert Monsen: "Re: one bit of memory?"
- Reply: Tom Horsley: "Re: one bit of memory?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]