Re: Delay without affecting pulse width
From: Kitchen Man (nannerbac_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/13/05
- Next message: stratus46_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Delay without affecting pulse width"
- Previous message: Larry Brasfield: "Re: Just checking if my thinking is right on an automotive LED lighting design"
- In reply to: stratus46_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Delay without affecting pulse width"
- Next in thread: stratus46_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Delay without affecting pulse width"
- Reply: stratus46_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Delay without affecting pulse width"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 12:01:24 -0700
On 10 Mar 2005 21:32:34 -0800 in sci.electronics.basics,
stratus46@yahoo.com wrote msg
<1110519153.984390.183960@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:
>Not what I had in mind, no. The OP wants a delay on both the leading
>and trailing edge, I.E. maintain the original pulse width, just delay
>it. Think of this as a 1 bit digitizer and the shift register is the
>memory. If your clock is good, no temperature variations, very
>predictable and pretty simple. Take the output from different bit
>counts and/or vary the clock rate for different/multiple delays.
I guess I didn't explain myself clearly. I don't think there is a
system clock, so to use this approach, a system clock has to be
developed and synchronized to the release pulse.
-- Al Brennan
- Next message: stratus46_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Delay without affecting pulse width"
- Previous message: Larry Brasfield: "Re: Just checking if my thinking is right on an automotive LED lighting design"
- In reply to: stratus46_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Delay without affecting pulse width"
- Next in thread: stratus46_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Delay without affecting pulse width"
- Reply: stratus46_at_yahoo.com: "Re: Delay without affecting pulse width"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]