Re: ISDN phone lines
From: Richard H. (rh86_at_no.spam)
Date: 03/28/05
- Next message: Nico Coesel: "Re: ISDN phone lines"
- Previous message: PeteS: "Re: RF power"
- In reply to: Nico Coesel: "Re: ISDN phone lines"
- Next in thread: Nico Coesel: "Re: ISDN phone lines"
- Reply: Nico Coesel: "Re: ISDN phone lines"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 00:42:10 -0700
Nico Coesel wrote:
>>No. An ISDN line is not like a POTS line. It's a 2-wire always-on data
>>circuit. The endpoint maintains a full-time heartbeat with the telco
>>switch at the other end.
>
>
> Sorry, that's not true. Depending on the settings in the public
> network, an ISDN line is put in 'standby' and needs to be activated
> before use.
I presume you're referencing the "always on" point. No doubt ISDN can
be made to be a switched service; it seems to support a great many
variations. I understand it can also be made multi-drop with
addressable nodes (e.g., POS terminals).
However, in practice, I've never seen an installation implement other
than always-on. (IIRC, blowing the cobwebs out, this is the Q.921 link
signaling, which is typically kept alive regardless of upper-layer Q.931
sessions.)
In what scenario would it be beneficial to tear down the link layer?
IIRC, it takes several seconds to establish Q.921, so this wouldn't be
friendly to many voice applications.
Cheers,
Richard
- Next message: Nico Coesel: "Re: ISDN phone lines"
- Previous message: PeteS: "Re: RF power"
- In reply to: Nico Coesel: "Re: ISDN phone lines"
- Next in thread: Nico Coesel: "Re: ISDN phone lines"
- Reply: Nico Coesel: "Re: ISDN phone lines"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|