Re: Pot resistance - 473 ?
- From: "Tom Biasi" <tombiasi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:10:31 -0400
"Peter Bennett" <peterbb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:bviei1tor046b8buia85q9gnvtt52pdma5@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:11:54 GMT, max-man@xxxxxxxxxxx (max-man) wrote:
>
>>I have a broken pot with 473 written on one side - is this 4.7K or 47K
>>? I always forget. :)
>>
>>
>>Thanks
>
> IF that is the value, then it is 47K - however, I don't think I've
> ever seen a pot of that value - pot values usually go 1, 2, 2.5, and
> 5, followed by some number of zeros.
>
> I suspect that 473 is (part of) the maker's model number, not the
> value.
>
>
> --
> Peter Bennett VE7CEI
> email: peterbb4 (at) interchange.ubc.ca
> GPS and NMEA info and programs:
> http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter/index.html
> Newsgroup new user info: http://vancouver-webpages.com/nnq
Peter,
47K is a pretty common pot.
Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pot resistance - 473 ?
- From: John Fields
- Re: Pot resistance - 473 ?
- References:
- Pot resistance - 473 ?
- From: max-man
- Re: Pot resistance - 473 ?
- From: Peter Bennett
- Pot resistance - 473 ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Pot resistance - 473 ?
- Next by Date: Re: Pot resistance - 473 ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Pot resistance - 473 ?
- Next by thread: Re: Pot resistance - 473 ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|