Re: Dipole antenna
- From: "Phil Allison" <philallison@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:12:18 +1100
"Anthony Fremont"
= a congenital autistic cretin
>>
>> > "thejim"
>>
>> > What do we mean by saying that a dipole antenna is electrically
> short?
>> >
>> > It means that the antenna is exhibiting capacitive reactance to the
>> > signal being applied.
>
** FUCKING Idiot.
>> It means the dipole antenna's width is less than a half wavelength of
>> the frequency.
>
> Electrically that is, not necessarily physically.
** WRONG - FUCKHEAD.
> You do know about velocity factor, right phil?
** IRRELEVANT to the antenna - FUCKHEAD !!
>> > Adding inductance can cancel that out.
>>
>>
>> ** Has no impact on the fact it is "electrically short" and hence an
>> inefficient radiator.
>
> Radiation efficiency has very little to do with any of this.
** WRONG - FUCKHEAD !!!
Fremont is a PIG IGNORANT ***.
A vile, anencephalic, autistic Texas Twat.
Millions of these evil PUKEs down there.
]
......... Phil
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dipole antenna
- From: Anthony Fremont
- Re: Dipole antenna
- References:
- Dipole antenna
- From: thejim
- Re: Dipole antenna
- From: Anthony Fremont
- Re: Dipole antenna
- From: Phil Allison
- Re: Dipole antenna
- From: Anthony Fremont
- Dipole antenna
- Prev by Date: Re: How can I subtract one frequency from another ???
- Next by Date: Re: Two Bridge Rectifiers In Parallel
- Previous by thread: Re: Dipole antenna
- Next by thread: Re: Dipole antenna
- Index(es):