Re: Dipole antenna


"Phil Allison" <philallison@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42f99vF1iprcuU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Anthony Fremont"
> = a congenital autistic cretin
>
> >>
> >> > "thejim"
> >>
> >> > What do we mean by saying that a dipole antenna is electrically
> > short?
> >> >
> >> > It means that the antenna is exhibiting capacitive reactance to
the
> >> > signal being applied.
> >
>
> ** FUCKING Idiot.

It's still true phil, no matter how many times you reply to it with
ad-hominem attacks. I can only hope that someone else that knows
something about antennas will step into this, lest some poor newbie
believe your nonsense.

> >> It means the dipole antenna's width is less than a half wavelength
of
> >> the frequency.
> >
> > Electrically that is, not necessarily physically.
>
>
> ** WRONG - FUCKHEAD.

That's precisely how it works. It has practically nothing to do with
physical length other than that's one of the multipliers used when
calculating the electrical length.

> > You do know about velocity factor, right phil?
>
>
> ** IRRELEVANT to the antenna - FUCKHEAD !!

Really now phil, you know even less than I suspected. Velocity factor
applies to all of it, especially the antenna itself.

> >> > Adding inductance can cancel that out.
> >>
> >>
> >> ** Has no impact on the fact it is "electrically short" and hence
an
> >> inefficient radiator.
> >
> > Radiation efficiency has very little to do with any of this.
>
>
> ** WRONG - FUCKHEAD !!!

Where is your disputing evidence phil?

> Fremont is a PIG IGNORANT ***.

Why don't you try providing some facts phil? Instead of name calling,
why don't you show us all some evidence to back up your libelous claims?

> A vile, anencephalic, autistic Texas Twat.
>
> Millions of these evil PUKEs down there.

I guess that was it. Typical spastic fit when you don't have an answer,
huh phil? I bet you have never made a single transmitting antenna for
HF or VHF. If you had, you'd probably be keeping your mouth shut now.

.

Quantcast