Re: Dipole antenna

Well Phil, I don't know how to tell you that, but, Anthony is right...

"Anthony Fremont" <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:wNuwf.70484$tO4.57028@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Phil Allison" <philallison@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:42f99vF1iprcuU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "Anthony Fremont"
>> = a congenital autistic cretin
>>
>> >>
>> >> > "thejim"
>> >>
>> >> > What do we mean by saying that a dipole antenna is electrically
>> > short?
>> >> >
>> >> > It means that the antenna is exhibiting capacitive reactance to
> the
>> >> > signal being applied.
>> >
>>
>> ** FUCKING Idiot.
>
> It's still true phil, no matter how many times you reply to it with
> ad-hominem attacks. I can only hope that someone else that knows
> something about antennas will step into this, lest some poor newbie
> believe your nonsense.
>
>> >> It means the dipole antenna's width is less than a half wavelength
> of
>> >> the frequency.
>> >
>> > Electrically that is, not necessarily physically.
>>
>>
>> ** WRONG - FUCKHEAD.
>
> That's precisely how it works. It has practically nothing to do with
> physical length other than that's one of the multipliers used when
> calculating the electrical length.
>
>> > You do know about velocity factor, right phil?
>>
>>
>> ** IRRELEVANT to the antenna - FUCKHEAD !!
>
> Really now phil, you know even less than I suspected. Velocity factor
> applies to all of it, especially the antenna itself.
>
>> >> > Adding inductance can cancel that out.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ** Has no impact on the fact it is "electrically short" and hence
> an
>> >> inefficient radiator.
>> >
>> > Radiation efficiency has very little to do with any of this.
>>
>>
>> ** WRONG - FUCKHEAD !!!
>
> Where is your disputing evidence phil?
>
>> Fremont is a PIG IGNORANT ***.
>
> Why don't you try providing some facts phil? Instead of name calling,
> why don't you show us all some evidence to back up your libelous claims?
>
>> A vile, anencephalic, autistic Texas Twat.
>>
>> Millions of these evil PUKEs down there.
>
> I guess that was it. Typical spastic fit when you don't have an answer,
> huh phil? I bet you have never made a single transmitting antenna for
> HF or VHF. If you had, you'd probably be keeping your mouth shut now.
>


.

Quantcast