Re: IF frequency
- From: "Phil Allison" <philallison@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 11:56:59 +1100
"John Fields"
"Phil Allison"
>>>>> I think he stated it rather succinctly since the IF _is_ the
>>>>> difference between the carrier and the LO, regardless of the
>>>>> location, spectrally, of either the carrier or the LO.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>** That excludes those receivers where the IF is the sum of the
>>>>received
>>>>carrier and the LO.
>>>
>>
>>( snip bunch of irrelevant stuff )
>>
>>
>>** Try reading my post again.
>>
>> More carefully this time.
>
>
> To what end?
** So you might discover your error.
If that is not it too *horrible* an experience.
> It's obvious ....... blah blah blah
** No is isn't.
........ Phil
.
- References:
- IF frequency
- From: thejim
- Re: IF frequency
- From: Peter Bennett
- Re: IF frequency
- From: John Fields
- Re: IF frequency
- From: Phil Allison
- Re: IF frequency
- From: John Fields
- Re: IF frequency
- From: Phil Allison
- Re: IF frequency
- From: John Fields
- IF frequency
- Prev by Date: Re: IF frequency
- Next by Date: Re: IF frequency
- Previous by thread: Re: IF frequency
- Next by thread: Re: IF frequency
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|