Re: Logarithmic response of PN junctions
- From: "Bob Eld" <nsmontassoc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 23:22:10 GMT
"Rich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie" <eatmyshorts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:pan.2006.08.03.22.30.14.815251@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I was just musing about "log amps", where they exploit the
exponential/logarithmic relationship between the current and
voltage of a PN junction.
My question is, is that always "log e", ie., "ln"? My point
being, is it _always_ base "e", rather than, say, log 10, or
log 2, or log something else?
Is that true for silicon, germanium, gallium arsenide, every
semiconductor?
Is that why they're called "natural logs"? If that's true, I
actually find it kind of spooky! :-)
Thanks!
Rich
It doesn't make any difference. Log, Ln they are both the same curve and
vary only in constants. Remember you can change the base of a logarithm by
simply dividing by the log of the other base, a constant. For example: logA
= lnA/ln10. And, lnB = logB/loge. You can change to any arbitrary base, 2,
hex, octal, whatever, the curve and the math is the same. The word "natural"
has to do with the base e, 2.718....and its relationship to trig functions,
vectors and other relations of higher mathematics, not to PN junctions.
Bob
.
- References:
- Logarithmic response of PN junctions
- From: Rich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie
- Logarithmic response of PN junctions
- Prev by Date: Re: 5 and 10 MHz clock inputs
- Next by Date: Transmitter
- Previous by thread: Logarithmic response of PN junctions
- Next by thread: Re: Logarithmic response of PN junctions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|