Re: [OT] Darwinism for Bob and Bob
- From: Jonathan Kirwan <jkirwan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:17:26 GMT
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:58:49 +0100, Clint Sharp
<clint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In message <9b04f2d9i52thpbjo8uu90br2qkn8h094g@xxxxxxx>, Mike
<nomtrxspam@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes
Just a quick question, if evolution is so wrong, why has the catholic
Bob Masta, see my previous post first.
The other Bob, read on.
church accepted it? BTW, please post this somewhere where it's more
appropriate, like alt.folklore or alt.fuckwit
Agreed. The OP might also, if really serious and seeking a better
understanding rather than trying to push some superstitious outlook,
post into evolutiongroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and listen and read the
responses and deal seriously and fairly with the objections as they
arise. There are/were some active researchers in there who know a
little about various aspects and can handle details in their area.
Jon
.
- References:
- [OT] Darwinism for Bob and Bob
- From: Mike
- Re: [OT] Darwinism for Bob and Bob
- From: Clint Sharp
- [OT] Darwinism for Bob and Bob
- Prev by Date: Re: Questions about Current Transformers:
- Next by Date: Re: Size of Resistors
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Darwinism for Bob and Bob
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] Darwinism for Bob and Bob
- Index(es):