Re: ultrasonic distance measurement using 89c51
- From: John Fields <jfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 13:40:35 -0600
On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 19:55:51 +0100, Stef Mientki
<S.Mientki-nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
don't forget that the accuracy in this practical case is mainly limited
If you wanted an accuracy of +/- 0.001" out of 2 inches, that's
+/- 0.05%, which I think is highly unlikely to be attainable since
the air temperature, pressure, and humidity would have to be known
to , say, twice that accuracy in order for the reading to be
believed.
I think something like +/- 5% is achievable, so that comes out to
0.1" for a 2 inch path, which is 7.6µs.
by the bandwidth of the ultrasonic transducer,
---
I hadn't even thought of that, thanks!
---
which isn't much at 40 kHz (and can't go much higher than a few hundred kHz).
Or you can use special tricks to create US,
like electronic generated sparks (works great)
and use high frequency US receivers.
---
OK. :-)
--
JF
.
- References:
- ultrasonic distance measurement using 89c51
- From: chetanthegreat
- Re: ultrasonic distance measurement using 89c51
- From: John Fields
- Re: ultrasonic distance measurement using 89c51
- From: Jon Slaughter
- Re: ultrasonic distance measurement using 89c51
- From: John Fields
- Re: ultrasonic distance measurement using 89c51
- From: Stef Mientki
- ultrasonic distance measurement using 89c51
- Prev by Date: Re: The mechanism behind bouncing...
- Next by Date: Re: The mechanism behind bouncing...
- Previous by thread: Re: ultrasonic distance measurement using 89c51
- Next by thread: Re: ultrasonic distance measurement using 89c51
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|