Re: How to count pulses per second ?

John Fields wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:58:46 -0600, "Anthony Fremont"
<spam-not@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Eric R Snow wrote:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:13:36 -0600, John Fields

No, it won't. He wants to detect pulses with varying widths and
varying spacing.

OK John, I'll take your word for it. You certainly know tons more
than me about electronics. I'll go back and read his original post
and see if I can figure out why what I thought was a solution is
not.

Please don't feed the trolls. :-)

To explain it in a less belligerent way, the OP doesn't guarantee
duty cycle or overall pulse width. This was further reitterated by
the OP when JF didn't get it either and had to ask.

---
And you knew precisely what he wanted from a less than precisely
worded statement? You're fulla ***, Fremont. You remind me of

Just like the post I made less than around 9:30 pm Tuesday says Fields,
you're the one making a mistake.

the kid who learned a magic trick one day and then pretended he knew
it all along. Kinda like "Positively Fourth Street."
---

Why he now thinks it proper to slap
you around for making the same error, but I digress.

---
If you think being brusque is slapping someone around you've got a
lot to learn. And who the hell are you to tell me what's proper and

ISTM, that I'm not telling you anything here, I was talking to Eric.

what isn't? I'm sure you've got enough on your hands just
controlling your own nasty ass than to worry about anyone else.
---

Pot, kettle, black and all that, ya know.

The OP only cares
about 10 pulses per second, and simply counting the pulses received
in one second will satisfy his requirements. The one second latency
to the output is of no concern either.

I guess I was right, huh?


.

Quantcast