Re: How to count pulses per second ?

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:53:20 -0600, "Anthony Fremont"
<spam-not@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

John Fields wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:32:52 -0600, "Anthony Fremont"
<spam-not@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

John Fields wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:52:47 -0600, "Anthony Fremont"
<spam-not@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

John Fields wrote:

---
The berating isn't direct, it's in your attitude and in your disdain
for anything other than a PIC to be used as a solution to a problem.
---

There you go again John, making untrue statements. I have never
even begun to insinuate something as stupid as that. Other
solutions are fine as long as the limitations are fine too. As I
stated before, this particular problem can be done with less parts
by using a PIC, and so far we all know that it can, including you
John. Why is that so disturbing to you?

---
It isn't, but I'd say that because of your constant whining about
how good a PIC would be in this application that you're upset
because the OP won't buy into it.
---

I don't care if the OP "buys into it", and that's not the issue. The issue
is you and your constant waffling crap.

---
No, the issue is your attitude.
---

---
I could be wrong, but it seems to me that when you say, "A PIC is
the right way to do it." that that's your way and that's what you're
telling them to use.
---

Suggesting the use of a PIC is a far cry from "ramming it down
someones throat", now isn't it John?

---
Yes, but perpetually bleating that it's the right solution is.
---

I never once said that it was the "right" solution, as if there is only one
solution. I said it was valid, simpler (less parts) etc....., that's your
own fantasy.

---
Do you not think it's the right solution?
---


Should I never suggest one?

---
Don't ask questions you know are stupid.
---

Have I ever suggested one in an inappropriate way?

---
Dunno, don't care.
---

You should since that was what most of your spewage was about.

---
Nope, what I've been saying all along is that if the OP chose not to
use a PIC, for whatever reason, then that's his decision and I'll do
hardware designs until the cows come home to get him what he wants.

You, on the other hand, even after having said how easy it would be
to do a software version haven't even offered to supply him with a
programmed chip he can try. What would it cost you? a couple of
bucks and you would have proved your point. But no, all you want to
do is bitch and moan about how wrong I am to do it the way I'm doing
it. *** you. Getting the OP what he wants is what I want to do,
not sit around and argue with the likes of you, although I must
admit I got sucked into it this time because of the hard time you
were giving Ed for no reason at all.
---


What are you talking about. I never even spoke directly to the OP about it.
Where did he tell ME no? Where was I begging him. Just a bunch more lies,
big surprise.

---
No, it's intent. It's clear you think PICs are the greatest things
since sliced bread and you get upset when your suggestion to use
them is turned down for reasons you think inappropriate.
---

And exactly what stimulated you to start this whole mess between us?

---
As I recall, the first time your name popped up where I was
concerned was in a post where I was talking about the good service I
got from sbcglobal.net and you came on strong about how stupid I was
for all kinds of reasons, none of which I care to rehash.

Aparently your memory is worse than I thought. The only thing I said
regarding your stupidity was about installing the yellow disc and not having
a seperate firewall. AIR, you got mad over my suggestion that if you were
happy with SBC/Yahoo support, then you were easy to impress. I still stand
behind that statement.

---
And your purpose for saying that was what? To make a joke? No. To
try to make a friend? No. To try to piss someone off by insulting
them? Bingo! I'll tell you what, Anthony, if I was easy to
impress, then I'd be impressed by you, but the fact is, I'm not. It
seems to me you're little more than an argumentative troll with an
unwarrantedly high opinion of himself, who's ready to tell everyone
just exactly how they should live their lives.
---


Well, I've glanced through the rest of your replies and it all just
seems to be frippery and evasion, much like the preceding, So I'll
just disengage now and leave you to your own devices.

Guess that means you've run out of lies to spread then. I'll take that as a
win then.

---
Take it any way that pleases you, I'm just tired of your
nonsensical, self-indulgent ***.


--
JF
.