Re: Receiver Specifications
- From: "Phil Allison" <philallison@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:19:32 +1100
"Myauk" <aungkokothet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1172555965.061511.50070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
** Google Wanker Alert !
They are measured with a laboratory full of specialized test equipment.
Or, if it is made in China, they just copy from a Japanese receiver
manual.
This is the point I would like to talk about.
** What is ?
If it is not that essential for service technicians,
** Who said that ?
it should not be described in Service Manual.
** It is there for good reasons.
Publications need to be reliable in my opinion.
** Which spec is " unreliable " ?
Is there any one who wishes to discuss?
** Rather talk to a stuffed toy.
For me I need to know which one is critical.
** Why assume there is only one ?
Gawd - what a smug, PITA cretin.
....... Phil
.
- References:
- Receiver Specifications
- From: Myauk
- Re: Receiver Specifications
- From: Homer J Simpson
- Re: Receiver Specifications
- From: Myauk
- Receiver Specifications
- Prev by Date: Re: Receiver Specifications
- Next by Date: Re: Electronic multi-switches
- Previous by thread: Re: Receiver Specifications
- Next by thread: odd(?) transistor switch behaviour
- Index(es):