Re: 555 question



Rich Grise wrote:
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:16:50 -0600, Anthony Fremont wrote:
James Beck wrote:

What did someone say, the PIC10 and 12 series are the 555 of today?
I would just about agree, with a little programming you could do the
above without all the external support parts. Use the internal RC
osc and you are on your way. Just look for the edge, do the output
"thing" and wait for the next edge, rising or falling, it's up to
you.

Show us your code. :-) Them's the rules. If you say "use a pic"
you're obligated to show how it's done. ;-)

Hear, hear!

Of course the next time you suggest a 555, you have to post a schematic as
well. ;-)


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: 555 question
    ... James Beck wrote: ... with a little programming you could do the ... above without all the external support parts. ... "thing" and wait for the next edge, rising or falling, it's up to you. ...
    (sci.electronics.basics)
  • Re: 555 question
    ... with a little programming you could do the ... above without all the external support parts. ... "thing" and wait for the next edge, rising or falling, it's up to you. ...
    (sci.electronics.basics)
  • Re: 555 question
    ... with a little programming you could do the ... above without all the external support parts. ... Use the internal RC osc ... "thing" and wait for the next edge, rising or falling, it's up to you. ...
    (sci.electronics.basics)
  • Re: 555 question
    ... with a little programming you could do the ... above without all the external support parts. ... Use the internal RC osc ... "hide and go fuck yourself"? ...
    (sci.electronics.basics)
  • Re: OT:Whats with the Gallop Poll?
    ... > Rich Grise wrote: ... Nitpicking their grammar just reinforces ... >> their programming, that we're hostile and liars and don't have a legal ...
    (sci.electronics.design)