Re: Inverting vs. Non-Inverting input for audio?
- From: Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:17:22 +0100
John Larkin wrote:
"MRW" <mr.whatever@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Someone sent me a link to Maxim's Audio Seminar where they claim that I
can learn stuff not found in the textbooks. Anyway, I somehow found out
about the new MAX9722 with DirectDrive. This caught my eye because it
said that I can eliminate huge DC blocking capacitors. Here is a link
to the data***:
http://datasheets.maxim-ic.com/en/ds/MAX9722-MAX9722B.pdf
I noticed that most of the circuits they have on the data*** uses
inverting input as the main input. I'm just curious why. Is there a
sound quality difference between inverting and non-inverting?
I would assume that the non-inverting option would be use so the signal
stays in phase. But again, I don't know too much about audio yet.
Thanks!
Was it Jim Williams who said "always invert"? Inverting results in
lower distortion because it eliminates common-mode-rejection errors,
which can be bad even in mega-gain opamps.
I'd like to see justification for that assertion wrt modern opamps.
Graham
.
- References:
- Inverting vs. Non-Inverting input for audio?
- From: MRW
- Re: Inverting vs. Non-Inverting input for audio?
- From: John Larkin
- Inverting vs. Non-Inverting input for audio?
- Prev by Date: Re: Inverting vs. Non-Inverting input for audio?
- Next by Date: Re: Inverting vs. Non-Inverting input for audio?
- Previous by thread: Re: Inverting vs. Non-Inverting input for audio?
- Next by thread: Re: Inverting vs. Non-Inverting input for audio?
- Index(es):