Re: Light better than WiFi for network connections?
- From: Al in Dallas <alfargnoli@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:29:42 -0500
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:22:53 +0100, Clint Sharp
<clint@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In message <1185651208.141458.73420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Al in
Dallas <alfargnoli@xxxxxxxxx> writes
I'm not sure this is the right group, but I recently read inNot without the full article but it's been done and it fell flat on it's
Scientific American that visible or infrared light would be a better
method to use to "talk" from a wired point on a wall to a room full of
computers than current WiFi or any other radio-wave solution. The
article kept stating that visible or infrared light was better because
they're made up of photons which don't interfere the way that radio
waves do. Since radio waves are also photons, this seemed like an
unreasonable explanation. Does anyone have any idea what the author
was trying to say?
arse in the 80s, 90s and probably will do so again.
If you subscribe to Scientific American Digital, you can read the
article at http://tinyurl.com/2xmdnu . It's in the July 2007 issue if
you want to find it on paper. It's named "Broadband Room Service by
Light."
--
Al in St. Lou
.
- References:
- Light better than WiFi for network connections?
- From: Al in Dallas
- Re: Light better than WiFi for network connections?
- From: Clint Sharp
- Light better than WiFi for network connections?
- Prev by Date: Re: oscillation stability
- Next by Date: Re: Inverting vs. Non-Inverting input for audio?
- Previous by thread: Re: Light better than WiFi for network connections?
- Next by thread: Very basic beginning electronics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|