Re: audio amplifiers: +/- X VDC vs 0-X VDC
- From: Don Bowey <dbowey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:48:35 -0700
On 9/25/07 5:48 PM, in article BMhKi.70$n96.62@xxxxxxxxxxxx, "Jamie"
<jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Ignorant sap sucker.
Jamie wrote:
If you were not using a dual polarized rail supply, then you would
have problems because the design would force you bias the IC so that the
output is generating 50% of the supply voltage. In this case, you'd need
a decoupling cap.
No, you'd need a COUPLING capacitor.
Graham
Go back and count your marbles, I think you've
lost some.
There is nothing wrong with using a wrong term, but why show your ignorance
over it by arguing when someone corrects the term? It is, after all, a
coupling capacitor.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: audio amplifiers: +/- X VDC vs 0-X VDC
- From: Jamie
- Re: audio amplifiers: +/- X VDC vs 0-X VDC
- References:
- audio amplifiers: +/- X VDC vs 0-X VDC
- From: mrdarrett
- Re: audio amplifiers: +/- X VDC vs 0-X VDC
- From: Jamie
- Re: audio amplifiers: +/- X VDC vs 0-X VDC
- From: Eeyore
- Re: audio amplifiers: +/- X VDC vs 0-X VDC
- From: Jamie
- audio amplifiers: +/- X VDC vs 0-X VDC
- Prev by Date: Re: single selection date , single service , single service date , single
- Next by Date: Re: Surge protection without grounded plugs
- Previous by thread: Re: audio amplifiers: +/- X VDC vs 0-X VDC
- Next by thread: Re: audio amplifiers: +/- X VDC vs 0-X VDC
- Index(es):