Re: Better than LM386 on batteries?
- From: Brendan Gillatt <brendanREMOVETHIS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 00:15:44 +0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
phaeton wrote:
I had looked at the CMOY once a couple years before, and forgotten
about it until PhattyMo just mentioned it. I forget why I didn't
build it then, maybe because (at the time) I thought the opamps it
lists are "special" somehow and they aren't carried by my fave
distributor, or something. Maybe I should just try it out with the op
amps I have.
Oh they are special - they're spectacularly expensive ;]
The Burr-Brown parts have fantastic specs, however, if you need it.
Furthermore, if your distributor doesn't carry them you can always
request a couple of samples. From my experience TI seem pretty good to
their customers, samples included.
- From my memory of building a CMOY, I recall that the specs for the part
he chose have an enormous current handling capability - ideal for driving
speakers/headphones without clipping.
Saying that, most regular op-amps will drive earphones to a decent level.
If you are going to build a CMOY don't don't don't use a 9v battery - the
life through a pair of 64ohm 'phones is, perhaps, 3 hours! Use some good
NiMH AAAs or consider looking at lithium polymer batteries.
- --
Brendan Gillatt
brendan {at} brendangillatt {dot} co {dot} uk
http://www.brendangillatt.co.uk
PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBACD7433
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFHbaiwkA9dCbrNdDMRAkS7AKDZeV1lWVRuKNPBl7vIiCJK9i8lbACgzG8a
rCOFLA8W+KE1HgLcR4KhQ3o=
=NX1E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Better than LM386 on batteries?
- From: phaeton
- Re: Better than LM386 on batteries?
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Better than LM386 on batteries?
- References:
- Better than LM386 on batteries?
- From: phaeton
- Re: Better than LM386 on batteries?
- From: Brendan Gillatt
- Re: Better than LM386 on batteries?
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Better than LM386 on batteries?
- From: LAB
- Re: Better than LM386 on batteries?
- From: phaeton
- Better than LM386 on batteries?
- Prev by Date: Re: PIC clock source.
- Next by Date: Re: Better than LM386 on batteries?
- Previous by thread: Re: Better than LM386 on batteries?
- Next by thread: Re: Better than LM386 on batteries?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|