Re: all this spam
- From: "Bob Monsen" <rcmonsen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:35:51 GMT
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:04jpp31g00tfrv1b5khb10fmtvgnd302tr@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 04:13:44 GMT, "Bob Monsen" <rcmonsen@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I've been off doing other things for a year or two, and have recently been
monitoring this group again. The spam problem is much worse than it was.
Does anybody have a good algorithm for marking it, or a suggestion for a
program to do that without generating too many false positives? It makes the
group much harder to read.
Thanks,
Bob Monsen
Do you see a lot of spam? I don't. I use Supernews, and they seem to
nuke the spam pretty well.
John
I'm getting it through sbcglobal.net now. There is quite a bit.
Regards,
Bob Monsen
.
- References:
- all this spam
- From: Bob Monsen
- Re: all this spam
- From: John Larkin
- all this spam
- Prev by Date: Re: Power = P = VI = I2R, V2/R
- Next by Date: Re: Power = P = VI = I2R, V2/R
- Previous by thread: Re: all this spam
- Next by thread: stepper motor power issues...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|