Re: Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe <toe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
John Popelish:
Do the calculation again but with the other hand on the
water tap or the grounded case of an appliance.
2 megaohms in series with less than an ohm = 2 megaohms
Still 115 microamperes.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- From: John Popelish
- Re: Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Re: Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- References:
- Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
- Re: Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- From: John Popelish
- Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- Prev by Date: Re: Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- Next by Date: Re: goodmorning
- Previous by thread: Re: Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- Next by thread: Re: Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- Index(es):