Re: Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- From: "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:47:02 -0400
Tomás Ó hÉilidhe wrote:
John Popelish:
Do the calculation again but with the other hand on the
water tap or the grounded case of an appliance.
2 megaohms in series with less than an ohm = 2 megaohms
Still 115 microamperes.
Then stick your hands into a live AC power line, after making sure
your will is up to date, and your insurance is paid up. You know just
enough to be dangerous. The resistance also depends on contact area,
and what part of the body. Loose the attitude, or someone will find you
dead from your ignorance.
--
aioe.org is home to cowards and terrorists
Add this line to your news proxy nfilter.dat file
* drop Path:*aioe.org!not-for-mail to drop all aioe.org traffic.
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
- Re: Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- References:
- Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
- Re: Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- From: John Popelish
- Re: Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
- Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- Prev by Date: Re: goodmorning
- Next by Date: Re: Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- Previous by thread: Re: Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- Next by thread: Re: Human Electrocution: How is the resistance not ridiculously high?
- Index(es):