Re: It doesn't set a very good example when the old hands violate the charter (was: FA:...)

From: "Anthony Fremont" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:49:09 -0600

Tom Biasi wrote:

I really didn't intend it to be an ad Michael.
Most of the other groups to which I belong welcome passing along info
to help others even if its a brief reference to an add.
I won't do it again. When a beginner asks, " Where can I get a good
meter at a decent price?" I'll remain silent.

I'm fairly sure that the silent majority doesn't have a problem with what
you did, it's just the local net-kop twats blowing off as usual. Ignore
'em. :-)

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: It doesn't set a very good example when the old hands violate the charter (was: FA:...)
  - From: David L. Jones
- Re: It doesn't set a very good example when the old hands violate the charter (was: FA:...)
  - From: Lord Garth

References:
- FA:Multimeter
  - From: Tom Biasi
- It doesn't set a very good example when the old hands violate the charter (was: FA:...)
  - From: JeffM
- Re: It doesn't set a very good example when the old hands violate the charter (was: FA:...)
  - From: news
- Re: It doesn't set a very good example when the old hands violate the charter (was: FA:...)
  - From: Michael Black
- Re: It doesn't set a very good example when the old hands violate the charter (was: FA:...)
  - From: Tom Biasi

Prev by Date: Re: It doesn't set a very good example when the old hands violate the charter (was: FA:...)
Next by Date: Re: LTSpice dependent sources symbol
Previous by thread: Re: It doesn't set a very good example when the old hands violate the charter (was: FA:...)
Next by thread: Re: It doesn't set a very good example when the old hands violate the charter (was: FA:...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread