Re: decoupling caps placement
- From: "tempus fugit" <toccata@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:56:06 -0500
"IanM" <Invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gioelo$qjh$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tim Wescott wrote:the
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 16:33:47 -0500, tempus fugit wrote:
Hey all;
I've got a circuit that uses 3 4049 inverters. On this IC, the V+ is on
pin 8 and the ground is on pin 1. I know that the decoupling caps need
to be as close to the IC as possible, but how can I connect 1 end of
capacitance?cap to V+ and the other to ground when the pins are so far away? Is it
sufficient to connect 1 end of the cap to V+ and the other to a nearby
ground node, or should the cap be connected close to the actual ground
pin of the IC? Also, do I use 1 cap for each IC? If so, (the ICs are
fairly close together) wouldn't the IC "see" the caps as being the
paralleled value of the 3 caps, thus reducing the available
toI was going to use 0.1uF for the value of each decoupling cap. Would it
also be wise to use a larger (1uF or higher) cap in parallel?
Thanks
For that chip a 100nF (0.1u) ceramic up by pin 1, with a lead straight
tryingpin 1 and another one straight to pin 8 will be more than sufficient.
You can think about reducing them later -- but why? Unless you're
manyto shave deci-pennies off of the board cost, it's better to have too
bypass caps than just enough.Some general comments on effective grounding and decoupling pitched at
hobbyists (pros will know how much they can save by cutting back on
both, but for the rest of us, the small additional cost is easily repaid
by time saved debugging a glitchy circuit):
By ground, I and most other dabblers in low voltage electronics mean
chassis, common rail, 0V, battery negative, Logic negative supply etc,
NOT a hard wired connection to a copper stake in the earth.
Electricians are different - when they say ground, they mean ground!
If building on veroboard or solderless breadboard, make sure you have
reliable power and ground rails. Except in exceptional circumstances,
DONT wire them point to point. (low level audio is an exceptional
circumstance with special layout and decoupling requirements as are high
gain RF amplifiers and high power circuits in general.)
Thanks for your reply Ian.
I am building on a non-etched board - one of those perfboards with little
copper pads you solder to (I assume this is the same as veroboard). What are
some of the special layout and decoupling requirements you mentioned in low
level audio circuits? I don't have any actual audio on this particular
board - it contains 3 voltage regulators (for 5, 9, and 12v) along with the
4049's in question, 2 8 bit latches, and a ULN2003 relay driver. The relays
are located on a separate board and switch audio signals from guitar fx
pedals in and out of the audio signal path.
Thanks
.
- References:
- decoupling caps placement
- From: tempus fugit
- Re: decoupling caps placement
- From: Tim Wescott
- Re: decoupling caps placement
- From: IanM
- decoupling caps placement
- Prev by Date: Re: 100W Audio Amplifier
- Next by Date: Re: Transformer winding insulation
- Previous by thread: Re: decoupling caps placement
- Next by thread: Re: decoupling caps placement
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|