Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF
From: Paul Burridge (pb_at_notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk)
Date: 07/23/04
- Next message: Sourav: "Re: Wich is the best sofware for electronic simulation?"
- Previous message: Kevin Aylward: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- In reply to: Kevin Aylward: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Next in thread: Kevin Aylward: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Reply: Kevin Aylward: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:47:18 +0100
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:11:10 GMT, "Kevin Aylward"
<salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote:
>It should work ok if you use the right value. Go and have a look at the
>basic spice capacitance equations. You can read I take it?
>
Hehe! You're such a card, Kev. I notice that you've avoided responding
to the original question in the thread, though! Bit beyond you was it?
;->
-- "What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.
- Next message: Sourav: "Re: Wich is the best sofware for electronic simulation?"
- Previous message: Kevin Aylward: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- In reply to: Kevin Aylward: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Next in thread: Kevin Aylward: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Reply: Kevin Aylward: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]