Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF
From: John Woodgate (jmw_at_jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk)
Date: 07/24/04
- Next message: Paul Burridge: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- In reply to: Kevin Aylward: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Next in thread: Paul Burridge: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Reply: Paul Burridge: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 09:13:59 +0100
I read in sci.electronics.design that Kevin Aylward
<salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote (in <4loMc.79702$y04.61616@fe2.news.b
lueyonder.co.uk>) about 'The bi-polar transistor at RF', on Sat, 24 Jul
2004:
>Oh dear...Clueless as usual again my son.
Just ignore him. He seems to delight in provoking and insulting people.
-- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. The good news is that nothing is compulsory. The bad news is that everything is prohibited. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
- Next message: Paul Burridge: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- In reply to: Kevin Aylward: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Next in thread: Paul Burridge: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Reply: Paul Burridge: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
