Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF
From: Paul Burridge (pb_at_notthisbit.osiris1.co.uk)
Date: 07/24/04
- Next message: Paul Burridge: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- In reply to: Kevin Aylward: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Next in thread: Kevin Aylward: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Reply: Kevin Aylward: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 12:11:33 +0100
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 07:37:36 GMT,
As yet unrecognized quantum electrodynamicist, astrophysicist,
mathematician, logician, neo-Darwinist, talented musican, programmer,
electronic designer, polymath and hierophant, Kevin Aylward wrote:
>History....
[the usual self-aggrandizement snipped]
If you're as smart as you make yourself out to be, you might address
the real questions here, rather than make continual attempts to gain
acceptance and recognition by blowing your own trumpet in an
embarrassingly obvious fashion.
HTH.
-- "What is now proved was once only imagin'd." - William Blake, 1793.
- Next message: Paul Burridge: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Previous message: John Woodgate: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- In reply to: Kevin Aylward: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Next in thread: Kevin Aylward: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Reply: Kevin Aylward: "Re: The bi-polar transistor at RF"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]