Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks
From: Ken Smith (kensmith_at_green.rahul.net)
Date: 08/23/04
- Next message: Jim Thompson: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Previous message: Ken Smith: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- In reply to: Jim Thompson: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Next in thread: Jim Thompson: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Reply: Jim Thompson: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Reply: Spehro Pefhany: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:34:08 +0000 (UTC)
In article <o4mii016pkf1gjno7i9d6u4f04au4ipifg@4ax.com>,
Jim Thompson <thegreatone@example.com> wrote:
[....]
>When Intel went to the P4 they tossed the dedicated math core, so they
>could devote more chip area to the pablum that the general public
>wants.
Sounds like the Intel I know and love.
Intel made the 8080. Zilog produced the Z80. The best Intel could
respond with was the 8085.
Intel made the 8051. Several others made work alikes. Intel is not even
in that business any more as far as I know.
Intel made the 8086, 186, 286, 386, 486, and then the Penti-uuuummm. It
took longer but they still managed to blow their leadership.
-- -- kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
- Next message: Jim Thompson: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Previous message: Ken Smith: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- In reply to: Jim Thompson: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Next in thread: Jim Thompson: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Reply: Jim Thompson: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Reply: Spehro Pefhany: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]