Re: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks
From: Active8 (reply2group_at_ndbbm.net)
Date: 08/23/04
- Next message: Jim Thompson: "Re: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Previous message: Jim Thompson: "Re: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- In reply to: Jim Thompson: "Re: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Next in thread: Jim Thompson: "Re: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Reply: Jim Thompson: "Re: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:48:31 -0400
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:22:16 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 03:28:26 GMT, "Mike Engelhardt" <nospam@spam.org>
> wrote:
>
>>Jim,
>>
>>> Ran the benchmark I posted 3 years ago.
>>>
>>> 2.175 times faster !!!
>>
>>But isn't that the benchmark that LTspice ran about 2.5x
>>faster than PSpice?
>
> Yes.
>
>> Could have gotten 2 years and 3
>>months on Moore's Law just by switching to LTspice.
>>
>>--Mike
>>
>
> But I love PSpice **and** the clone that is coming soon ;-)
>
> ...Jim Thompson
What clone? Whose clone.
-- Best Regards, Mike
- Next message: Jim Thompson: "Re: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Previous message: Jim Thompson: "Re: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- In reply to: Jim Thompson: "Re: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Next in thread: Jim Thompson: "Re: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Reply: Jim Thompson: "Re: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]