Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks
From: keith (krw_at_att.bizzzz)
Date: 08/24/04
- Next message: keith: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Previous message: keith: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- In reply to: Ken Smith: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Next in thread: Active8: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 21:39:29 -0400
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:26:35 +0000, Ken Smith wrote:
> In article <MPG.1b933431e13dafa6989968@news1.news.adelphia.net>,
> KR Williams <krw@att.biz> wrote:
> [... me ...]
>>> I assume these were all with the same OS.
>
>>I'd hope we're talking a 64b OS and software for the A64.
>>Otherwise the gains are truly remarkable!
>
> JT says Win2K Pro so its a 2 bit OS
I can't argue too much with either of you. I moved on from OS/2 to Win2K
*because* it was the only MickeyMouse OS that deserved the title of "OS".
I knew then that any M$ OS was a only stop-over until I could comit to
Linux. ...and I've finally gone around that bend I hope (some issues
left). I'll not go to XP, unless I'm dragged screaming. I'll retire
first. ;-)
-- Keith
- Next message: keith: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Previous message: keith: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- In reply to: Ken Smith: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Next in thread: Active8: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]