Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks

From: qrk (SpamTrap_at_reson.com)
Date: 08/26/04

  • Next message: Jim Thompson: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks" 
    Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:53:41 -0700

    Jim, what version of PSpice are you using for this latest benchmark?
    Version made a big difference from 9.2 to 9.2.3. I'm posting the whole
    table of tests we have run. The Athlon-64 seems to be 15% more
    efficient than the old Athlon XP processor. Note that PSpice doesn't
    take advantage of the fancy stuff that some processors have to offer.

      PSpice Sim Sim time
    Computer (seconds) at 1 GHz
    ============ ========== ========
    P2, 266 MHz 1800 479 (Win95, PSpice 9.2)
    P2, 440 MHz 1082 476 (NT4.0, PSpice 9.2)
    P3, 800 MHz 510 408 (Win2K, PSpice 9.2)
    P3, 1000 MHz 420 420 (Win2k, PSpice 9.2)
    P4, 1500 MHz 413 620 (Win2k, PSpice 9.2)
    ATH TB 1200 MHz 270 324 (WinME, PSpice 9.2)
    ATH TB 1200 MHz 244 293 (Win2k A7A266, PC2100, PS9.2)
    ATH TB 1200 MHz 244 293 (Win2k A7A266, PC133, PS9.2)
    ATH TB 1400 MHz 210 294 (Win2k A7A266, PSpice 9.2)
    ATH XP 1467 MHz 210 308 (Win2k A7M266, PSpice 9.2)
    ATH XP 1467 MHz 167 245 (Win2K A7M266, PSpice 9.2.3)
    P4 Xeon 2400MHz 205 493 (WinXP, PSpice 9.2)
    ATH64 2.2 GHz 97 213 (Win2K, PSpice ?????) 

    ----
Mark
  • Next message: Jim Thompson: "Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks"