Re: OT: Wheeeeee! New PSpice Benchmarks

From: Jim Thompson (thegreatone_at_example.com)
Date: 08/26/04 

Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:14:57 -0700

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:53:41 -0700, qrk <SpamTrap@reson.com> wrote:

>Jim, what version of PSpice are you using for this latest benchmark?
>Version made a big difference from 9.2 to 9.2.3. I'm posting the whole
>table of tests we have run. The Athlon-64 seems to be 15% more
>efficient than the old Athlon XP processor. Note that PSpice doesn't
>take advantage of the fancy stuff that some processors have to offer.
>
>
>  PSpice Sim Sim time
>Computer (seconds) at 1 GHz
>============ ========== ========
>P2, 266 MHz 1800 479 (Win95, PSpice 9.2)
>P2, 440 MHz 1082 476 (NT4.0, PSpice 9.2)
>P3, 800 MHz 510 408 (Win2K, PSpice 9.2)
>P3, 1000 MHz 420 420 (Win2k, PSpice 9.2)
>P4, 1500 MHz 413 620 (Win2k, PSpice 9.2)
>ATH TB 1200 MHz 270 324 (WinME, PSpice 9.2)
>ATH TB 1200 MHz 244 293 (Win2k A7A266, PC2100, PS9.2)
>ATH TB 1200 MHz 244 293 (Win2k A7A266, PC133, PS9.2)
>ATH TB 1400 MHz 210 294 (Win2k A7A266, PSpice 9.2)
>ATH XP 1467 MHz 210 308 (Win2k A7M266, PSpice 9.2)
>ATH XP 1467 MHz 167 245 (Win2K A7M266, PSpice 9.2.3)
>P4 Xeon 2400MHz 205 493 (WinXP, PSpice 9.2)
>ATH64 2.2 GHz 97 213 (Win2K, PSpice ?????)
>
>----
>Mark

I'm running v10.0.0i

                                        ...Jim Thompson 

-- 
|  James E.Thompson, P.E.                           |    mens     |
|  Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
|  Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
|  Phoenix, Arizona            Voice:(480)460-2350  |             |
|  E-mail Address at Website     Fax:(480)460-2142  |  Brass Rat  |
|       http://www.analog-innovations.com           |    1962     |
             
I love to cook with wine.      Sometimes I even put it in the food.