Re: To know at last what are light and electricity :
From: Brad Velander (SpamThis_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 10/18/04
- Previous message: Clarence: "Re: World's worst software. What's decent?"
- In reply to: Clarence: "Re: To know at last what are light and electricity :"
- Next in thread: Clarence: "Re: To know at last what are light and electricity :"
- Reply: Clarence: "Re: To know at last what are light and electricity :"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 02:19:18 GMT
So your posting with no intrinsic value is OK but someone else's
is not. Interesting view.
If someone has read the prior post then they can judge the value
of that post without your guidance or superior judgement. Do they
have to also read another no value post from you just to know
that the previous post had no value?
Seems you practice hypocrisy at the highest practical levels.
-- Sincerely, Brad Velander "Clarence" <no@No.com> wrote in message news:yKBcd.31800$QJ3.1828@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com... > > "Brad Velander" <SpamThis@nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:sFBcd.127985$a41.1024@pd7tw2no... > > Clarence, > > > > "Posted, nothing of value." > > > > A clear understanding of the value of the link.... > > I have recieved enough feed back to establish that my posting was apreciated.
- Previous message: Clarence: "Re: World's worst software. What's decent?"
- In reply to: Clarence: "Re: To know at last what are light and electricity :"
- Next in thread: Clarence: "Re: To know at last what are light and electricity :"
- Reply: Clarence: "Re: To know at last what are light and electricity :"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|