Re: Another Spice Trap?
From: Mike Engelhardt (nospam_at_spam.org)
Date: 11/22/04
- Next message: Jim: "Re: How to analyze resistor of an RF coil?"
- Previous message: keith: "Re: Latest News"
- In reply to: Paul Burridge: "Re: Another Spice Trap?"
- Next in thread: Helmut Sennewald: "Re: Another Spice Trap?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 04:26:14 GMT
Paul,
>> The usual SPICE convention is for the direction
>> of positive current flow to be from the 1st node
>> to the 2nd node of a capacitor. In LTspice, for
>> the cap symbol, that's from node "A" to node "B"
>> which is downward if the symbol is placed without
>> rotating it.
>
> C'mon, Mike; fix the problem and make every LT user
> happy. It ain't no big deal!
I(C1) has a sign convention that LTspice follows.
You can even refer to that current in behavioral
expressions -- something missing in most SPICE's,
e.g., PSpice.
If you get confused with the direction of current
in a cap, just add a phasing dot to the symbol,
something you can do yourself with the graphical
symbol editor.
But the program should not ship with phasing dots
on such symbols.
--Mike
- Next message: Jim: "Re: How to analyze resistor of an RF coil?"
- Previous message: keith: "Re: Latest News"
- In reply to: Paul Burridge: "Re: Another Spice Trap?"
- Next in thread: Helmut Sennewald: "Re: Another Spice Trap?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]