Re: What is correct method?
From: Gary Crowell / VCP (vcp_at_cableone.net)
Date: 03/19/05
- Previous message: Robert: "Re: OT: Search Engines for PC Searching?"
- In reply to: qrk: "Re: What is correct method?"
- Next in thread: Brad Velander: "Re: What is correct method?"
- Reply: Brad Velander: "Re: What is correct method?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 21:09:45 -0700
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:36:05 -0800, qrk <SpamTrap@reson.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 15:43:31 -0500, Ivan <ivanzr1@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>For general reference, if there is an instance where certain mounting
>>holes should be part of a chassis ground net, is it proper to give
>>them a part number and include them in the schematic, or is it ok to
>>just electrically connect them on the PCB side with no record of them
>>in either schematic or PCB netlist?
>>
>>Thank you,
>>
>>Ivan
>
>Make a schematic part and connect it properly in the schematic. The
>DRC will be happy with this technique. Plus, when you hand out the
>project for someone else to do the layout work, there is no question
>what to do with this mounting hole.
>
>Mark
Absolutely agree. Its an excellent idea to have a library of mounting
hole components (even for those that are not connected to a net - then
they show, correctly, as no connects). In some systems you can set
an attribute (I call mine NBI), to indicate that the 'component' is
not to be listed on the BOM.
Gary Crowell, CID
Micron Technology
- Previous message: Robert: "Re: OT: Search Engines for PC Searching?"
- In reply to: qrk: "Re: What is correct method?"
- Next in thread: Brad Velander: "Re: What is correct method?"
- Reply: Brad Velander: "Re: What is correct method?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|