Re: LTspice
From: Ken Smith (kensmith_at_green.rahul.net)
Date: 03/21/05
- Next message: ldg: "Re: LTspice"
- Previous message: Pera Mitic: "Re: SuperSpice and new component"
- In reply to: ldg: "Re: LTspice"
- Next in thread: ldg: "Re: LTspice"
- Reply: ldg: "Re: LTspice"
- Reply: ldg: "Re: LTspice"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:07:56 +0000 (UTC)
In article <9rbr3156lgmhjsde20broe064ghd6ih7i1@4ax.com>,
ldg <asfd@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
>Ltspice really does run well under wine. I was impressed. I didn't
>do benchmarks, so have no way of knowing at this point how the extra
>overhead might affect a long simulation.
I think you will find that the extra overhead of running it under Windows
(at least Win98) makes it run only a little slower than it does using
wine. Is this what you mean?
[...]
>arranged them differently? If true it makes one wonder if the word
>duh means anything to these folks. Then again, why is it some vendors
>seem to be able to write distro independent software for linux and
>while others can't?
Some companies have good programmers and others don't. In some cases, it
isn't that the software will not work just fine on some other system, it
just that the maker only tests it on one version and makes their install
script test for that specific version.
I use SuSE to run "dosemu" to run the DOS Orcad. I had troubles with DOS
orcad running dos windows on Windows machines. So far there has been no
problem under dosemu. Unlike windows, xdosemu allows the DOS window to be
resized etc.
-- -- kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
- Next message: ldg: "Re: LTspice"
- Previous message: Pera Mitic: "Re: SuperSpice and new component"
- In reply to: ldg: "Re: LTspice"
- Next in thread: ldg: "Re: LTspice"
- Reply: ldg: "Re: LTspice"
- Reply: ldg: "Re: LTspice"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]