Re: Problems with SPICE models from vendors (FIXED!)
From: Tony Williams (tonyw_at_ledelec.demon.co.uk)
Date: 03/28/05
- Next message: wesam: "cc2420 pcb design"
- Previous message: Tony Williams: "Re: Problems with SPICE models from vendors (FIXED!)"
- In reply to: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Problems with SPICE models from vendors (FIXED!)"
- Next in thread: xray: "Re: Problems with SPICE models from vendors (FIXED!)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 13:25:54 +0100
In article <FoR1e.18312$4%3.15162@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
Kevin Aylward <see_website@anasoft.co.uk> wrote:
huge snip]
> I've been there dude, I am still there. Sure, lots of things may
> be "useful". Whether or not it makes any business sense to do so
> is another matter. LTSpice is still only an *indirect* way to
> generate revenue. Maybe it could be cost effective to add more
> bells and whistles, but the impression I got was still this
> "looking a gift horse in the mouth" sort of thing. I suppose you
> also want fries with that?
You can of course conveniently ignore any of the other
posts I have made praising/recommending LTspice.
-- Tony Williams.
- Next message: wesam: "cc2420 pcb design"
- Previous message: Tony Williams: "Re: Problems with SPICE models from vendors (FIXED!)"
- In reply to: Kevin Aylward: "Re: Problems with SPICE models from vendors (FIXED!)"
- Next in thread: xray: "Re: Problems with SPICE models from vendors (FIXED!)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]