Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- From: Bernhard Krämer <Bernhard.Kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 21:19:54 +0200
Hello,
your discussion about gEDA is very interesting. For the moment, I have a
high-school project where I also have to design a circuit of middle size
(in the order of 15 Opamps, 40 resistors and a lot of capacitors, but also
some switches, flipflops and mosfets. In spite of the huge number of parts,
it's not very complicated).
A few years ago, I used Eagle. Unfortunately, Eagle is not an option here
because the lab I currently work in doesn't own a full version of it. So,
for a first prototype, I used Protel DXP. And IMHO, I never used such an
ugly program before! It is the absolutely contrary to "user-friendly" --
for giving an example, I needed more than half a day of desesperate
searching involving half the lab to find out how to print in the /correct/
scale, and that in spite of the manual under my hands.
You can imagine that I would prefer not to use it for the next prototype of
my circuit. On the other hand, I do not really have much time these days.
So, what do you think: Is it worth to learn gEDA and to redraw some symbols
that might not be available, or should I use Protel DXP, having all parts I
need and only loosing time in some trap that Protel DXP might devise? Which
choice would save more time ?
> There was an article about gEDA in Circuit Cellar, March issue. I read it
because I was considering using it and wanted to reduce the learning curve
(never enough time and no one will pay me to learn something). I likely
won't be using it now, but I'd like to share my thoughts (sent to the
article authors) and all of you can comment as you see fit.
>
> 1. The article was a nice introduction, but not enough detail for me to
feel comfortable doing a project yet. Hope they will do a series of
articles on using all of the gEDA facilities, which are impressive.
Are they available on the internet?
> 2. What would be nice is a book similar to "Build Your Own Printed Circuit
Board" (by Al Williams), which uses Eagle. This is a very good hand-holder,
but not a great reference text. Still, it serves the purpose of getting
people started with Eagle. I'm using Eagle because a free version came with
the book. The problem is that who has the time to write a book!?! Doing a
book is really a project in its self. An example of a good e-book (on
Knoppix) is at:
> http://www.pjls16812.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/knowing-knoppix/index.html
Perhaps it could be an idea that interested gEDA uses and programmers create
a wikibook, see : http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Main_Page
These are books where everybody can contribute.
Yours,
Bernhard
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- From: Stuart Brorson
- Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- From: DJ Delorie
- Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- References:
- gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- From: Mike Rocket J. Squirrel Elliott
- Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- From: Stuart Brorson
- Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- From: DJ Delorie
- Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- From: Stuart Brorson
- Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- From: DJ Delorie
- Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- From: Dave Boland
- gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- Prev by Date: Re: Parametric sweep of model implementation
- Next by Date: Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- Previous by thread: Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- Next by thread: Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|