Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- From: Chuck Harris <cf-NO-SPAM-harris@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 12:04:30 -0400
Mike Rocket J. Squirrel Elliott wrote:
On 5/2/2005 11:30 AM Tom Loredo wrote:
> Photoshop, Dreamweaver, Illustrator, UPS Worldship, Quickbooks, > Quicken . . . those are my major reasons to stick with WinXP. I'm a > > one-man show, not just an engineer.
Well, you can use all those under Mac OS X, *and* gEDA
<snip>
Well, I don't know if buying a Mac and re-buying all the apps I listed just to run gEDA is going to be much of a cost savings over updating my Protel 3.5 Client to the Latest. It is certainly a lot more expensive than just staying as-is.
On the otherhand, most anybody can find a spare 20G partition on their hard drive these days. Load linux into that partition, ask Grub to make your machine a dual boot machine with *gack* 'doze as the primary/default boot, install gEDA in the usual way, and join the crowd.
-Chuck .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- From: Mike Rocket J. Squirrel Elliott
- Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- References:
- Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- From: Tom Loredo
- Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- From: Mike Rocket J. Squirrel Elliott
- Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- Prev by Date: Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- Next by Date: Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- Previous by thread: Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- Next by thread: Re: gEDA suite vs my creaky old Protel Client 3.5?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|