Re: Another discrepancy (LTspice/switchcad3)
- From: "Mike Engelhardt" <nospam@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 15:47:24 GMT
Robert,
>>> The results are way off.
>>
>> The simulation is probably right around correct.
>> That FET and diode have capacitance. .
>
> Adding a small capacitance has no effect.
But that doesn't remove the capacitance that's already
swamping the circuit. The problem is the circuit design,
not the models.
> I will try your 1619 circuit later
That one works. Notice that that SMPS topology is
a boost. To get higher output voltage, you might try
a tapped-inductor boost. That will reduce the voltage
rating required of the MOSFET and make the circuit
less sensitive to its capacitance. If you're not really
after a SMPS, but some high impedance high voltage,
you can probably get a chopped square wave working
into a diode voltage multiplier to work. That gets rid
of the problem of getting high impedance energy
storage inductors with little stray capacitance.
-Mike
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another discrepancy (LTspice/switchcad3)
- From: Robert Baer
- Re: Another discrepancy (LTspice/switchcad3)
- References:
- Another discrepancy (LTspice/switchcad3)
- From: Robert Baer
- Re: Another discrepancy (LTspice/switchcad3)
- From: Mike Engelhardt
- Re: Another discrepancy (LTspice/switchcad3)
- From: Robert Baer
- Another discrepancy (LTspice/switchcad3)
- Prev by Date: Re: "No PSpiceTemplate for DN1" warning in OrCAD 10.3 after Placing Database Part
- Next by Date: Re: Book Recommendations for OrCAD (10.3)
- Previous by thread: Re: Another discrepancy (LTspice/switchcad3)
- Next by thread: Re: Another discrepancy (LTspice/switchcad3)
- Index(es):