Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- From: Paul Rako <s_p_mpa_u_l@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:47:33 GMT
Wow. What a thread. Well, since I am a pal with both Bob Pease and Marcello, the guy that gets out National's SPICE models I suppose I should toss in my two cents.
First, save any effort in contacting National. We have better things to do then make SPICE models for 30-year-old parts. It is interesting that just tonight I was telling Bill Gross and Tim Regen from LT how the 709 was noisy-- I thought I had heard it from Pease but Bill corrected me--the 741 was noisy, the 709 was actually pretty good. And yeah, that is what Pease said as well, I am geting old.
Next, it looks like a simple Google search would have turned up something but thanks for this little tempest.
Next, there is a huge disconnect with people that use SPICE for board-level and with people that use SPICE for IC design. Yeah, just buy a UNIX workstation ($20k) buy Cadence (150k++) and then run two departments-- one called "Process" and one called "Modeling" ($5-10M) and yup, after 5 years or so you will be able to get good results from SPICE. God bless you.
And, if you buy PSPICE for 10k and still spend the 5 or 10 million those two departments, the modeling and process departments, you can still get good results for transistor-level simulation. Linear Tech uses PSPICE for IC design. I have been told that LT-Cad is just a variant of PSPICE so I am somewhat baffled how people can claim it works "better".
But, PSPICE will still have trouble converging and doing things with fast edges or digital (mixed signal) stuff. That may be why National does not release A to D converter SPICE models. Now with the transistor-level models, Cadence and a weekend to run, an A to D can yield to SPICE, I suspect that Thompson guy gets things to work.
But now I leave you IC designers.. .if you want, I can post the twenty pages of emails I traded with Barrie Gilbert of Analog Devices over this exact subject.
For board-level SPICE you have to be very careful. National's recent models are very good. We even model noise-- just watch the Pease Show (now called "Analog by Design") in a week or two. We just taped it yesterday. We will show how you can check your models to see if the noise shows up like in the real world. We will show National's WEBENCH filter designer SPICE exactly matching Electronics Workbench MultiSim8 SPICE and a real-world board I built, all agreeing within 1/2 dB. At 10kHz. Next I will build a 15MHz filter. That one will not do so well because all my board strays will start effecting the circuit. Stay tuned.
But if you are pushing the edge (and why would you need to do SPICE if you weren't), well, you better be very good to understand all the limitations of board-level SPICE. You have to make sure you have good models and test the models against the real world. Next you have to model the board level stuff. Maybe buy Hyperlynx, the 48 grand 2 1/2 D field-solver to see trace interaction. Maxwell's Equations are always right. But you must build exact 3-D models of your circuit and have a lot of computer power.
And before you accuse Pease of being a hopeless curmudgeon, please separate his "stage persona" from the real guy. I have seen him tell a young guy who asked about SPICE the perfect response-- use it carefully and a little at first and build on your correlations to allow you to SPICE more and more stuff.
And Bob may be a "kook" but he is a truly brilliant man.
So is Barrie Gilbert.
And Jim Thompson.
I just want to get them together in a WWF ring one day.
Now this has been a great thread and it raises some truly great issues for us at National Semiconductor. So when I go in tomorrow I will be sure to get some answers to the question that seems most crucial: "Bob, did you rally wear lederhausen in college?" And if the answer is yes, "Were they lined with silk like the ones in the National Lampoon Mr. Rogers' parody?"
Paul
Neil wrote:
Looking for a spice model or subcircuit netlist for the LM709 from National semiconductor. I asked intusoft, cause they have a free model service. I bought their entry level software ICAP/4 8.3.3 from a dealer purchased in 2000. For reasons I won't mention, I was denied the request from their sales department.
I was going to email National, but from what I read in Bob's book "Troubleshooting Analog circuits" he doesn't like S.P.I.C.E. and for good reason...........:)
Any help on this request would be great....
Thanks Neil
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- From: Neil
- Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- From: Kevin Aylward
- Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- From: analog
- Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- From: Mike Engelhardt
- Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- References:
- Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- From: Neil
- Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- Prev by Date: Re: speed of tran analysis in SPICE3
- Next by Date: Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- Previous by thread: Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- Next by thread: Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- Index(es):