Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- From: kensmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ken Smith)
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 14:24:26 +0000 (UTC)
In article <LdSZe.684$Fi3.327@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Paul Rako <sp_a_mpa_u_l@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Never heard of such a thing. Please name one or two and I will look them up.
>As I keep saying over and over and over I am concenred with board-level
>tools, not what is available for ICs.
[....]
There are a couple of nice programs that will check your PCB layout
program's netlist output against the spice net list to find errors. They
use some tricks to relate the net names to each other so that they will
find nets that are broken into two sections and nets that are shorted.
They are free to download and I was going to give you the link but since
you top posted I decided not to.
>
>> <Since material top posted am cutting out previous>
>>
>> "Having a separate SPICE schematic
>>
>>>violates this principle. Now you have something whose coherence is only
>>>assured by human inspection."
>>
>>
>> Why do you assume this?
>>
>> Aren't LVS or "Layout versus Schematics" tools known in your work?
>>
>> Robert
>>
>>
--
--
kensmith@xxxxxxxxx forging knowledge
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- From: Chuck Harris
- Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- From: Paul Rako
- Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- References:
- Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- From: Neil
- Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- From: Paul Rako
- Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- From: Robert
- Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- Prev by Date: Re: Trial Circuit Analysis Contest
- Next by Date: Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- Previous by thread: Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- Next by thread: Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- Index(es):