Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- From: Paul Rako <sp_a_mpa_u_l@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:22:46 GMT
Is Top-Posting time or space based? Is it because my Thunderbird client is set to reply first with your quotes underneath?
Geez, no 4 hour LT SPICE seminar and no LVS tools. Sigh.
Paul
Ken Smith wrote:
In article <LdSZe.684$Fi3.327@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Rako <sp_a_mpa_u_l@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Never heard of such a thing. Please name one or two and I will look them up. As I keep saying over and over and over I am concenred with board-level tools, not what is available for ICs.
[....]
There are a couple of nice programs that will check your PCB layout program's netlist output against the spice net list to find errors. They use some tricks to relate the net names to each other so that they will find nets that are broken into two sections and nets that are shorted. They are free to download and I was going to give you the link but since you top posted I decided not to.
<Since material top posted am cutting out previous>
"Having a separate SPICE schematic
violates this principle. Now you have something whose coherence is only assured by human inspection."
Why do you assume this?
Aren't LVS or "Layout versus Schematics" tools known in your work?
Robert
.
- References:
- Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- From: Neil
- Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- From: Paul Rako
- Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- From: Robert
- Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- From: Ken Smith
- Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- Prev by Date: Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- Next by Date: Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- Previous by thread: Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- Next by thread: Re: Wanted: LM-709 (Spice model) National Op-Amp
- Index(es):