Re: IMSI Instant Engineer: Ok for simple dwgs?
- From: Joerg <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 22:25:48 GMT
john jardine wrote:
"Joerg" <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageLike PDF? I guess we are all a bit guilty as well as we have allowed it to be foisted unto us. HTML would be fine for pretty much all documentation purposes but I guess that format wasn't complicated enough for the powers to be. And, gasp, it is an open standard. At least it was until some dudes in the North-West, well, lets not go there again.
news:jUVKh.13112$FG1.2843@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[...]
Can you import AutoCad models and other graphics formats, for example
for large connectors and stuff like that? Is the file exchange with
AutoCad users pretty smooth? Those were (and still are) some issues
after I switched to Eagle because the de-facto standard here in the West
is OrCad. At least for now. Right now that means my layouter who doesn't
use Eagle must trace every schematic I send his way :-(
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com
Yep. It's read OK the Autocad files I've had sent.
Will export in Autocad 'format' but not tried it, as I avoid Autocad like
the plague.
".DWG .DXF", another example of sheer marketing clout foisting a proprietry,
poor quality format onto technical users.
john
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: IMSI Instant Engineer: Ok for simple dwgs?
- From: JeffM
- Re: IMSI Instant Engineer: Ok for simple dwgs?
- References:
- IMSI Instant Engineer: Ok for simple dwgs?
- From: Joerg
- Re: IMSI Instant Engineer: Ok for simple dwgs?
- From: JeffM
- Re: IMSI Instant Engineer: Ok for simple dwgs?
- From: Joerg
- Re: IMSI Instant Engineer: Ok for simple dwgs?
- From: Richard Kanarek
- Re: IMSI Instant Engineer: Ok for simple dwgs?
- From: Joerg
- Re: IMSI Instant Engineer: Ok for simple dwgs?
- From: john jardine
- Re: IMSI Instant Engineer: Ok for simple dwgs?
- From: Joerg
- Re: IMSI Instant Engineer: Ok for simple dwgs?
- From: john jardine
- IMSI Instant Engineer: Ok for simple dwgs?
- Prev by Date: Re: IMSI Instant Engineer: Ok for simple dwgs?
- Next by Date: Re: IMSI Instant Engineer: Ok for simple dwgs?
- Previous by thread: Re: IMSI Instant Engineer: Ok for simple dwgs?
- Next by thread: Re: IMSI Instant Engineer: Ok for simple dwgs?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|