Re: Question about reversed-polarity in an AC outlet
From: Sam Goldwasser (sam_at_saul.cis.upenn.edu)
Date: 02/22/05
- Next message: Larry Brasfield: "Re: Question about reversed-polarity in an AC outlet"
- Previous message: Zak: "Re: Question about reversed-polarity in an AC outlet"
- In reply to: Bob Myers: "Re: Question about reversed-polarity in an AC outlet"
- Next in thread: Larry Brasfield: "Re: Question about reversed-polarity in an AC outlet"
- Reply: Larry Brasfield: "Re: Question about reversed-polarity in an AC outlet"
- Reply: Bob Myers: "Re: Question about reversed-polarity in an AC outlet"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 22 Feb 2005 17:05:00 -0500
"Bob Myers" <nospamplease@address.invalid> writes:
> "Sam Goldwasser" <sam@saul.cis.upenn.edu> wrote in message
> news:6w650klkwo.fsf@saul.cis.upenn.edu...
> > John Miller <me@privacy.net> writes:
> >
> > > Sam Goldwasser wrote:
> > > > From the point of view of user safety, it shouldn't matter.
> > > <and>
> > > > There will be some differences like whether the shell or center of a
> > > > light bulb socket is electrically live if the switch is off.
> > >
> > > Ummm...you don't see just the least bit of inconsistency in those two
> > > comments?
> >
> > Pick all the nits you want but you aren't supposed put your fingers in
> > the socket when changing a light bulb.
>
> True, but I'm afraid you're missing something here, Sam.
>
> It's not a matter of "putting your fingers in the socket"; when
> unscrewing a bulb, there will be a time when the threaded side
> of the bulb's base will be both (a) exposed and (b) still in
> contact with the side of the socket. It would be a Really
> Good Thing if the live side of the connection (which is
> SUPPOSED to be at the contact to the bulb tip, not the
> side) were disconnected before that happens, don't you think?
I do agree that in a matter of diminishing returns, having the center
hot rather than the outer shell is better, though you have to admit
it would take some effort to reach *around* the bulb to get at the base
while changing the bulb. Oh, but I forgot, people ARE morons and
have no idea that touching the base could be a bad thing. And, of course,
should the bulb break, it's less likely that you would end up touching
the center than the outer shell when removing it with a potato.
Would you legislate that ALL lamps in the USA be required to be made
and retrofitted to have polarized plugs way and have the LAMP POLICE
do regular inspections to assure that?
How many lamps in your house have non-polarized plugs? :) How many times
have you replaced the plug or cord without noting which side was which?
--- sam | Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ Mirror: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/
Repair | Main Table of Contents: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/
+Lasers | Sam's Laser FAQ: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/sam/lasersam.htm
| Mirror Sites: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/F_mirror.html
Note: These links are hopefully temporary until we can sort out the excessive
traffic on Repairfaq.org.
Important: Anything sent to the email address in the message header above is
ignored unless my full name is included in the subject line. Or, you can
contact me via the Feedback Form in the FAQs.
- Next message: Larry Brasfield: "Re: Question about reversed-polarity in an AC outlet"
- Previous message: Zak: "Re: Question about reversed-polarity in an AC outlet"
- In reply to: Bob Myers: "Re: Question about reversed-polarity in an AC outlet"
- Next in thread: Larry Brasfield: "Re: Question about reversed-polarity in an AC outlet"
- Reply: Larry Brasfield: "Re: Question about reversed-polarity in an AC outlet"
- Reply: Bob Myers: "Re: Question about reversed-polarity in an AC outlet"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|