Re: LM336 vs. LM336B ?
- From: "Roger Hamlett" <rogerspamignored@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 20:40:42 GMT
<clicliclic@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1126982269.683068.214760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Roger Hamlett schrieb:
> "Andre Majorel" <cheney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:slrndil386.s25.cheney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > What is the difference between the LM336 and LM336B ? I can't
> > find any on the data *** I have doesn't show any and yet
> > Farnell carries both (at very different prices).
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> The standard National data ***, has two columns in the electrical
> characteristics section, one labelled 'LM136A/LM336A', and the other
> 'LM336B'.
> This should probably read LM136A/LM236A. The LM136 has an operating
> temperature range from -55°C to +150°C, the LM236 from -25°C to
> +85°C.
No. There is a seperate column for the 136/236.
> > The B has slightly worse tolerance on the initial reference voltage,
> > but
> > about twice as good temperature stability.
>
> Best Wishes
>
> The LM336 is specified at (2.49 +/- 0.10)V at 25°C, and the LM336B at
> (2.49 +/- 0.05)V, which is twice as good. Between the two, there is no
> difference in temperature stability. The stability of the LM136 and the
>
> LM236 is worse because it refers to a larger temperature range.
>
> Martin.
Sorry, but this differs completely from the ***. The 136/236, has it's
own seperate column. I can only say what is printed on the sheets I
have...
Best Wishes
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LM336 vs. LM336B ?
- From: clicliclic
- Re: LM336 vs. LM336B ?
- References:
- LM336 vs. LM336B ?
- From: Andre Majorel
- Re: LM336 vs. LM336B ?
- From: Roger Hamlett
- Re: LM336 vs. LM336B ?
- From: clicliclic
- LM336 vs. LM336B ?
- Prev by Date: Re: LM336 vs. LM336B ?
- Next by Date: Re: LM336 vs. LM336B ?
- Previous by thread: Re: LM336 vs. LM336B ?
- Next by thread: Re: LM336 vs. LM336B ?
- Index(es):