Re: Windows XP optimization tricks
- From: "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 20:42:02 GMT
Randy Yates wrote:
John Hadstate <jh113355@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
USENET is broken. It was designed for an era when intelligent,
educated people used it to get real work done. It is highly
vulnerable to exploitation by degenerates, and it should surprise no
one that this has happened.
I'd hate to throw the baby out with the bathwater as it is otherwise a
great medium for discussion/consultation.
If the important groups were made moderated, would that not solve most
of the problem?
It would kill most groups, because someone has to read and approve every
message. I've heard of some newer moderation software that allows white
listing, but I have no details. Unless there is real time posting, the
group is fairly useless. Who wants to wait hours, or days for their
message to appear? Take a look ar Guy Macon's moderated newsgroup, or
any other moderated newsgroup for that matter.
news:rec.radio.broadcasting was an active moderated newsgroup. The
moderator died. Another finally took over, but the group is more or
less dead.
--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.
Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
.
- References:
- Re: Windows XP optimization tricks
- From: Randy Yates
- Re: Windows XP optimization tricks
- Prev by Date: Re: what kind of capacitor do I need? (preamp circuit)
- Next by Date: Re: Windows XP optimization tricks
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows XP optimization tricks
- Next by thread: Re: Windows XP optimization tricks
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
