Re: Bad vendor: pcbcore.com -- SPAMs Usenet
- From: Mike Harrison <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:52:54 +0100
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:33:32 +0200, Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
pcbcore@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 9??18??, ????3??11??, JeffM <jef...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:You are judged by your spamming a _non_sale_ newsgroup.
pcbcore@ hotmail.com wrote:
[SPAM] China[SPAM]- ?????????????? -- ?????????????? -
We are a professional PCB supplier, JeffM, you don't use our service
before how can you say we are a bad vendor, it's not a responsible
practice, right?
Welcome to our website www.pcxxxxxx.com, only who use it before could
judge us. Thanks.
That makes you an a-social creep.
FFS get a life.
People whinging about on-topic product announcements are far more annoying than the messages that
caused them.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bad vendor: pcbcore.com -- SPAMs Usenet
- From: TT_Man
- Re: Bad vendor: pcbcore.com -- SPAMs Usenet
- References:
- Bad vendor: pcbcore.com -- SPAMs Usenet
- From: JeffM
- Re: Bad vendor: pcbcore.com -- SPAMs Usenet
- From: pcbcore
- Re: Bad vendor: pcbcore.com -- SPAMs Usenet
- From: Sjouke Burry
- Bad vendor: pcbcore.com -- SPAMs Usenet
- Prev by Date: Re: Bad vendor: pcbcore.com -- SPAMs Usenet
- Next by Date: Re: Difference between the two Farnells
- Previous by thread: Re: Bad vendor: pcbcore.com -- SPAMs Usenet
- Next by thread: Re: Bad vendor: pcbcore.com -- SPAMs Usenet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|